Research system

A publication architecture built to change its mind.

Project 150 publishes ideas as versioned research objects. Every major claim must expose its evidence level, limitations, competing explanations and the result that would make us abandon it.

Current research question

Does aging erode the independence of biological error correction?

BREAKTHROUGH CANDIDATE

The current candidate proposes that common-mode drift and loss of independent reference channels may reduce reserve even when average damage is unchanged. Direct causal evidence is absent.

Open Breakthrough Process v2.0

Publication standard

Every release carries the same scientific spine.

The content model is deliberately explicit so future reports can be added without losing provenance or uncertainty.

  1. 01title
  2. 02slug
  3. 03date
  4. 04version
  5. 05authors
  6. 06status
  7. 07abstract
  8. 08content
  9. 09references
  10. 10evidence level
  11. 11limitations
  12. 12falsification criteria
  13. 13last updated

Evidence language

Four labels. No hidden promotion.

01

KNOWN

A result directly shown within the cited study and identified with its evidence level. It is not automatically generalisable.

02

SUPPORTED INFERENCE

A conclusion that joins several known findings but has not been demonstrated as a complete causal chain.

03

SPECULATIVE

A biologically coherent possibility without a direct test. It remains outside established evidence.

04

NEW PROJECT 150 HYPOTHESIS

A new, explicit and falsifiable proposal from Project 150. It is not an established discovery.

Research taxonomy

Designed for a multi-year publication record.

  • Aging
  • Longevity
  • Systems Biology
  • AI Research
  • Regeneration
  • Cancer Safety
  • Spatial Biology
  • Fault Containment