Mission, values and decisions
Dawid sets the long-term objective, ethical boundaries, questions and publication decisions. Human judgement remains responsible for what the project claims.
Project 150 / Mission
A long-term research mission with a deliberately distant horizon.
Project 150 is an independent human–AI research initiative exploring longevity, aging biology, systems medicine and future intervention principles. It is not a pharmaceutical company or a clinical laboratory.
PROJECT TYPE
Independent research initiative
FOCUS
Longevity × systems biology × AI-assisted research
OUTPUT
Reports, hypotheses, audits, notes and falsification programmes
BOUNDARY
Research—not diagnosis, treatment or self-experimentation
WHY150?
Moonshot objective
A direction that forces long-term thinking.
150 is not a prediction, guarantee or claim about what medicine can currently achieve. It is a symbolic horizon.
The number forces Project 150 to ask questions that do not fit a five-year optimisation cycle: how to protect function now, how to design research systems that survive changing technology, how to preserve cancer defence while improving repair, and how a person might remain capable of reaching future advances in good condition.
A moonshot objective is useful only when it increases discipline. It must not be used to turn uncertainty into a promise.
Human × AI research
A partnership with explicit roles and limits.
Synthesis, systems reasoning and red team
AI supports literature mapping, cross-disciplinary hypothesis generation, causal modelling, adversarial critique, versioning and scientific editing.
Experiments outrank both
Neither human conviction nor AI coherence substitutes for laboratories, preregistration, independent replication, clinical evidence or regulatory oversight.
Research method
Build the idea and its strongest enemy together.
- 01
Define the question
State the problem and the evidence hierarchy before searching for an answer.
- 02
Map known evidence
Separate direct findings from synthesis, speculation and new hypotheses.
- 03
Import outside frameworks
Use control theory, reliability, evolution and network science to generate tests—not proof by analogy.
- 04
Audit originality
Search prior art, downgrade overlapping claims and remove renamed existing ideas.
- 05
Design the kill test
Specify matched controls, competing models, hard outcomes and falsification thresholds.
- 06
Run adversarial red team
Invite oncology, statistics, immunology, systems biology and trial-design objections.
- 07
Publish a version, not a verdict
Keep limitations, null routes, sources and the next decision visible.
Operating principles
What the project refuses to trade away.
Function before surrogate
Clocks and omics can explain a mechanism. They cannot by themselves prove rejuvenation or longer life.
Falsification before optimisation
Test whether the variable exists before designing an intervention around it.
Cancer safety by design
Regeneration and tumour suppression are co-objectives, not efficacy followed by a late safety check.
Uncertainty can mean no action
If the system is not observable, the controller does not escalate.
Version everything
A superseded idea stays visible so the path from v1.0 to v2.0 can be audited.
No clinical theatre
A research architecture must never be presented as a personal treatment protocol.
Research trajectory
The next milestone is not a therapy.
Adaptive Longevity Therapy: state gating and durable reserve.
Breakthrough Process: error covariance and reference independence.
Show that geometry can be changed independently of burden.
Two fault classes, both sexes, multiple sites and hard function.
Discuss only after causal replication and a credible long-latency safety case.
Founder
Dawid
Project 150 is a personal, long-term longevity and human–AI research mission founded by Dawid. The public identity is intentionally focused on the work rather than private personal data.
About the founder